Your Salesforce org is growing. So is your storage bill. Here’s exactly what you’re paying for — and how to stop overpaying.
If you’ve ever clicked into your Salesforce Setup, navigated to Company Information, and felt a small knot form in your stomach at the storage usage bar… you’re not alone. Salesforce storage warnings are one of the most common (and most expensive) operational surprises that admins and IT leaders face as their orgs scale. And in 2026, with visual content flooding into Salesforce from field teams, customer portals, and automated workflows, the problem is only accelerating.
This guide breaks down exactly how Salesforce file storage pricing works, what it costs when you run out, and why more and more teams are turning to purpose-built solutions like SharinPix to solve the problem at the root.

How Salesforce File Storage Actually Works
Salesforce splits storage into three distinct buckets, and confusing them is the first mistake most teams make.
Data Storage covers your structured CRM records, such as accounts, contacts, opportunities, cases, and custom objects. Big Objects handle archival data at scale. But the one that tends to catch teams off guard is File Storage: the allocation used by every attachment, image, video, PDF, document, and binary file uploaded to your org.
By default, Salesforce provides 10 GB of file storage per org, plus an additional 2 GB per user license (for most editions). That sounds generous, until you realize that a single high-resolution image from a field inspection can be 8–10 MB, a short product demo video can run several hundred MB, and an org with 50 active users generating visual content daily can consume its entire allocation in weeks, not months.
The math catches up fast.
The Real Price of Running Out
When you hit your file storage limit, Salesforce doesn’t quietly let things slide. Admins receive system warnings, users may lose the ability to upload files, and in some cases org functionality begins to degrade. It’s a hard stop that interrupts real work.
The official fix? Purchase additional storage directly from Salesforce. In 2026, additional file storage is sold in 1 GB increments at approximately $5 per GB per month, which translates to $60 per GB per year. For an org consuming 100 GB of file storage (not unusual for a mid-sized company with active field operations), that’s $6,000 annually just for storage overhead, before any licenses, apps, or infrastructure costs.
But the price tag on the invoice is only part of the story. The hidden costs are often larger:
- Admin overhead: Time spent auditing, archiving, and deleting files to reclaim space
- User friction: Employees blocked from uploading, or forced into workarounds that break their workflow
- Lost data context: Files deleted to save space means lost visual history on records: inspection photos gone, signed contracts inaccessible, site documentation erased
None of these appear on a Salesforce invoice. All of them cost time and money.
Where Files Come From (And Why It Escalates Fast)
Understanding the storage problem means understanding where files originate. The usual suspects:
- Field service teams uploading job-site photos, before/after documentation, and equipment images
- Email-to-Case or email integrations that automatically attach every inbound message and its attachments
- PDF generation tools creating quotes, contracts, work orders, and inspection reports
- Customer portals where clients submit photos, receipts, or supporting documentation
- Marketing and product teams storing brand assets, product visuals, and promotional content
The critical distinction is that visual files are disproportionately large compared to structured data. A single Salesforce Opportunity record might consume a few kilobytes of data storage. But the three photos, one video walkthrough, and signed PDF attached to that same opportunity? Easily 50–100 MB of file storage.
A field technician completing five jobs a day and uploading four photos per job generates roughly 200 MB daily. Multiply that across a team of 20 technicians and you’re looking at 4 GB per day — exceeding many orgs’ entire default file storage allocation in less than a week.
Real-World Example: A Field Operations Team Hits the Wall
To make this concrete, consider a mid-sized field service company running Salesforce with a team of technicians completing inspections, installations, or maintenance jobs daily. Each worker uses a mobile app to fill out structured forms: capturing photos of equipment, site conditions, completed work, and any defects found. Some jobs also require short video walkthroughs.
This is an increasingly common profile, and the storage numbers are sobering.
Based on 2026 field app standards, a high-resolution inspection photo averages around 5 MB (12MP–50MP compressed JPEG or HEIC), while a minute of 1080p video runs approximately 150 MB. An intensive field worker (capturing 50 photos and 2 minutes of video per working day) consumes roughly 121 GB of storage per year. That means Salesforce’s default 10 GB org allocation is gone in under a month for a single power user.
| User Profile Level | Photos/Day | Video/Day | Annual Storage |
| Intensive | 50 | 2 min | ~120 GB |
| Moderate | 25 | 1 min | ~60 GB |
| Light | 10 | 0 min | ~11 GB |
Scale even the light or moderate usage level to a team, and the math becomes alarming:
A team of just 5 intensive users will burn through 100 GB in roughly two months. At Salesforce’s overage rate of ~$5/GB/month, that team is looking at hundreds of dollars in extra storage charges every single month, before the rest of the org’s file activity is even factored in.
And this is precisely why the cost problem is exponential rather than linear. Storage needs don’t stay flat year over year; they grow as teams expand, job volumes increase, and documentation standards get more rigorous. The storage bill that feels manageable in Year 1 doubles by Year 2 and triples by Year 3, with no natural ceiling in sight.
Common Workarounds (And Why They Fall Short)
Faced with storage limits, most teams improvise. Unfortunately, most improvised solutions create new problems.
Manual deletion and archiving policies are the most common first response. Admins set retention rules, users are asked to clean up their files, and temporary relief is purchased at the cost of permanent data loss and ongoing administrative burden. It doesn’t scale.
Manually linking to SharePoint or Google Drive preserves the files but breaks the native Salesforce experience. Users leave the record to find the file, context is lost, and adoption falls off within weeks.
Custom-built integrations with AWS S3 or Azure Blob Storage can work technically, but they require significant development investment, ongoing maintenance, and specialist knowledge to keep functioning as Salesforce updates its APIs. For most organizations, the total cost of ownership exceeds the cost of simply buying more Salesforce storage.
The problem with all of these approaches is the same: they treat the symptom rather than the cause.
SharinPix: External Visual Storage Built for Salesforce
SharinPix takes a fundamentally different approach. Rather than managing file storage within Salesforce, SharinPix is a native Salesforce managed package that moves all visual file storage to an external, purpose-built infrastructure, all while making those files feel completely native inside your org.
What that means in practice: every image, video, PDF, 3D digital twin, or other visual asset is stored on SharinPix’s infrastructure, not inside Salesforce. But from any Salesforce record, users see and interact with those files exactly as if they were stored locally. No context-switching. No broken links. No degraded experience.
And because the files never touch Salesforce file storage, the usage meter stops climbing.
SharinPix supports every major visual format out of the box: JPEG, PNG, RAW, HEIC, MP4, PDF, and emerging 3D and immersive formats for industries using digital twin technology. Storage scales with your needs without the $60-per-GB-per-year overhead.
For a team consuming 100 GB of visual content, the savings are immediate and measurable. More importantly, the workflow improves: files load faster, records are richer, and admins spend their time on higher-value work.
Beyond Storage: SharinPix as Your Visual Operations Layer
Solving the storage problem is just the beginning. What makes SharinPix genuinely distinctive is what it enables once your visual files are in the platform. Think of it as transforming Salesforce from a data CRM into a visual canvas, a place where your teams don’t just store images, but work with them:
- Capture photos directly from mobile, in the field, attached automatically to the right Salesforce record
- Manipulate assets without leaving Salesforce: resize, crop, annotate, watermark, and edit images natively
- Share visual content securely with customers, contractors, or internal stakeholders through branded, controlled experiences
And for field teams, SharinPix’s offline mobile forms take this further still. Structured, visual data collection that works without a connection: capturing photos, completing forms, and syncing back to Salesforce the moment connectivity is restored. It’s the kind of field capture experience that turns a CRM into an operational system of record.
Conclusion: Fix the Root Cause, Not the Symptom
The bottom line is simple: Salesforce storage costs accumulate fast, and they compound even faster. If your team relies on photos, videos, PDFs, or any advanced visual file types to do their work, the math turns against you quickly. Consider a team spending an extra $6,000 on storage in Year 1 — that same growth adds another $6,000 in Year 2 (now $12,000 annually), and another $6,000 in Year 3 (now $18,000). Left unaddressed, it doesn’t plateau — it accelerates, and it will get out of control before most organizations realize what’s happening.
The good news: Salesforce file storage costs are predictable, quantifiable, and, with the right approach, entirely avoidable. The orgs that manage this well aren’t the ones with the most aggressive deletion policies or the most complex custom integrations. They’re the ones that recognized early that visual content belongs on purpose-built infrastructure, not inside a CRM.
SharinPix was built specifically to solve this problem: moving visual files out of Salesforce storage, preserving the native experience your users expect, and unlocking a full layer of visual operations that a CRM alone can never provide.
Ready to see how much you could save?
Head on over to the Salesforce AgentExchange to learn more about SharinPix and chat with one of our Visual Experts, who will help you understand just how much you could be saving on Salesforce Storage costs.
